Supporters were asked why they didn’t want a dual carriageway bypass:
Desecration of national park. Destruction of woodland and threat to local wildlife.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
I don’t want our valley being destroyed!
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Ancient woodland should be protected at all costs, especially the Binsted complex, as the largest tract on the south coast.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Ruins the views and acoustics for an entire half of Arundel.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
It will increase traffic.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Because it will waste money and ruin the environment with no benefit to drivers or the town.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
I care about the countryside.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
If sitting in my car for a few extra minutes at Arundel is the price for saving beautiful and irreplaceable countryside around it, then it’s a price I’m willing to pay. Stop and think!
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Ruins the views and acoustics for an entire half of Arundel.coast.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Waste of a quarter of a billion pounds.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
It will increase pollution and therefore impact on climate change.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
The impact on the town and environment in the future.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Fury at destruction of peaceful countryside, bad use of public resources at a time of austerity and growing inequality.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Because it will just clog up again at a different point! It will needlessly destroy an area of beauty.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
No justification for a dual carriageway. It makes sense to keep online. There is the least amount of irreversible damage by saying online.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
I don’t want a dual carriageway over the wild bit of the river.
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Because it won’t actually reduce traffic! Ruining Arundel’s surrounding countryside by building a dual carriageway is a disproportionate response and it won’t work!!
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
It will just move the bottlenecks further up the road (both ways).
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)
Climate change!
![](http://www.a27arundel.org/wp-content/plugins/testimonial-builder/assets/images/test.png)